Page 2 of 3

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:00 am
by jimbobjaw
Superhans wrote:
Two of Diamonds wrote:http://www.broadcasting.vitalfootball.c ... ?a=7505416

Looks like a 3 year deal has been sorted out.
so they have sold it to a chanel thats only avilable for sky customers. :x
Yes but if you sign up quickly you can also see Celtic'e Europa League play-off!!! Everyone wants to see that ;) :lol:

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:12 am
by StaceyH
Sky subscribers still have to pay separately for this channel, just like we had to for Setanta - I won't be :(

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:13 am
by wewantourdarbyback
Superhans wrote:
Two of Diamonds wrote:http://www.broadcasting.vitalfootball.c ... ?a=7505416

Looks like a 3 year deal has been sorted out.
so they have sold it to a chanel thats only avilable for sky customers. :x
Whereas Sultana was free of course... ;)

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:33 am
by Mad Dog
wewantourdarbyback wrote:
Superhans wrote:
Two of Diamonds wrote:http://www.broadcasting.vitalfootball.c ... ?a=7505416

Looks like a 3 year deal has been sorted out.
so they have sold it to a chanel thats only avilable for sky customers. :x
Whereas Sultana was free of course... ;)
For Virgin media customers with the right subscription it was. ;)

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:39 am
by wewantourdarbyback
Mad Dog wrote:
wewantourdarbyback wrote:
Superhans wrote:
Looks like a 3 year deal has been sorted out.
so they have sold it to a chanel thats only avilable for sky customers. :x
Whereas Sultana was free of course... ;)
For Virgin media customers with the right subscription it was. ;)[/quote]

Ah, the free that you have to pay for :P ;)

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:45 am
by Mad Dog
Ah, the free that you have to pay for :P ;)
Not really when compared to what Sky offered as an equivalent. ;) Here it is:

http://pressoffice.virginmedia.com/phoe ... ID=1028530

Basically a better all round package. Included phone as well.

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:54 pm
by Superhans
wewantourdarbyback wrote:
Superhans wrote:
Two of Diamonds wrote:http://www.broadcasting.vitalfootball.c ... ?a=7505416

Looks like a 3 year deal has been sorted out.
so they have sold it to a chanel thats only avilable for sky customers. :x
Whereas Sultana was free of course... ;)
i never said it was ....but it could be subscribed to through most tv companies for this you can only get it on sky.....im with virgin!!!

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:12 pm
by wewantourdarbyback
Mad Dog wrote:
Ah, the free that you have to pay for :P ;)
Not really when compared to what Sky offered as an equivalent. ;) Here it is:

http://pressoffice.virginmedia.com/phoe ... ID=1028530

Basically a better all round package. Included phone as well.
Might be, if Virgin could actually get any of their services to work in Leeds, massive problems for just about everyone signed up to them here for the last 4 years and they've done nothing about it. I'll stick with Sky.

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:29 pm
by Turveyman
I had Setanta for the duration of their deal with the BSP. I have to say that watching 90 minutes of non league football that didn't involve the Diamonds was far from great entertainment. Unsurprisingly, a few teams dominated the schedules mainly York, Torquay and Oxford. Rushden did not get much of a look in neither did the smaller teams who would have benefited more from the coverage.

Re: New TV Deal ??

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:47 pm
by Mad Dog
wewantourdarbyback wrote:
Mad Dog wrote:
Ah, the free that you have to pay for :P ;)
Not really when compared to what Sky offered as an equivalent. ;) Here it is:

http://pressoffice.virginmedia.com/phoe ... ID=1028530

Basically a better all round package. Included phone as well.
Might be, if Virgin could actually get any of their services to work in Leeds, massive problems for just about everyone signed up to them here for the last 4 years and they've done nothing about it. I'll stick with Sky.
They've generally behaved themselves for as long as we've had them. Probably been lucky. Sky on the otherhand were bastards when we cancelled with them. We moved to (then) NTL due to it being cheaper and also being able to afford Sky Sports. Whilst my dad was on the phone trying getting through the guy's head that we were cancelling, they changed our subscription without consultation, removing some packages and adding others. Needless to say that pissed him off further.

Anyway we've had different experiences with them, so can't really cast judgement on the other's.
Turveyman wrote:I had Setanta for the duration of their deal with the BSP. I have to say that watching 90 minutes of non league football that didn't involve the Diamonds was far from great entertainment. Unsurprisingly, a few teams dominated the schedules mainly York, Torquay and Oxford. Rushden did not get much of a look in neither did the smaller teams who would have benefited more from the coverage.
Tbh, although it was nice when we were on, it was a team under Garry Hill. Not nice viewing usually in the flesh, let alone on TV. I do agree there was a bias towards the larger sides, but probably because Setanta thought they would draw bigger audiences.