Re: Why
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 10:16 pm
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
The unofficial AFC Rushden & Diamonds messageboard
https://www.afcdiamondsforum.uk/
Basil wrote::oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
Dukes wrote:Our major problem is we have no width - we try to play the ball through a narrow corridor in front of goal, very easy to defend with lots of bodies there.
I was delighted when Charles finally came on yesterday, and when we got the ball wide to him instead of simply lumping it up to Farrell, we looked a far better teamrudolph_hucker wrote:Dukes wrote:Our major problem is we have no width - we try to play the ball through a narrow corridor in front of goal, very easy to defend with lots of bodies there.
I'm reliably informed that a certain left sided player is not too happy at his current club. Oh and he had a blinding game last week.
He did well against Plops i thought. Sounds crazy, but he could been MOM yesterday IMO!Everyweeker wrote:I was delighted when Charles finally came on yesterday, and when we got the ball wide to him instead of simply lumping it up to Farrell, we looked a far better teamrudolph_hucker wrote:Dukes wrote:Our major problem is we have no width - we try to play the ball through a narrow corridor in front of goal, very easy to defend with lots of bodies there.
I'm reliably informed that a certain left sided player is not too happy at his current club. Oh and he had a blinding game last week.
Not man of the match, but he certainly a player who I think is really promising and did play well when he came on. His work rate in particular should be applauded (take note Curtis Osano).TheIncognitoKid wrote:He did well against Plops i thought. Sounds crazy, but he could been MOM yesterday IMO!Everyweeker wrote: I was delighted when Charles finally came on yesterday, and when we got the ball wide to him instead of simply lumping it up to Farrell, we looked a far better team
MOTM couldn't pick one :!: .Charles did ok and i thought we pick up a bit when Johnson and Miller came on.There were so many wasted balls pumped up to Faz yesterday and he was beaten to the majority of them.Mad Dog wrote:Not man of the match, but he certainly a player who I think is really promising and did play well when he came on. His work rate in particular should be applauded (take note Curtis Osano).TheIncognitoKid wrote:He did well against Plops i thought. Sounds crazy, but he could been MOM yesterday IMO!Everyweeker wrote: I was delighted when Charles finally came on yesterday, and when we got the ball wide to him instead of simply lumping it up to Farrell, we looked a far better team
100% Agreed. 4-4-2 is the way forward!Dukes wrote:Wrong system of play, we need wide playes, that simple.
The times in games when players have the ball and look to switch play and see no one there out wide on the opposite wing is dispiriting. So what do they do - well the ball goes backwards and eventually hoofed up field by the goalie and collected by the oppositions defence.
I hear Brazil can play 4-3-3......
We're in Blue Square Bet Premier League - time to get real - and I don'y mean Madrid..! ;)