Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:36 pm
4-3-3 is winning then.
The unofficial AFC Rushden & Diamonds messageboard
https://www.afcdiamondsforum.uk/
Yes, but only because JE got the first team to sign and vote...Mad Dog wrote:4-3-3 is winning then.
Eh? Didn't look like it watching it in person, was very much 4-3-3 throughout.HiHoRushden&Diamonds wrote:According to the radio, Justin changed the formation towards the end. Both goals were scored towards the end... ;)
Maybe, but you lost all credibility in my eye after you had Porter lined up to play as a winger in one of the team line up topics on here! ;)Dukes wrote:Yes, but only because JE got the first team to sign and vote...Mad Dog wrote:4-3-3 is winning then.;)
Had to put someoned out there - only seem to have one wide player at the moment in Charles. - by the way he's the one that voted for 4-4-2..Mad Dog wrote:Eh? Didn't look like it watching it in person, was very much 4-3-3 throughout.HiHoRushden&Diamonds wrote:According to the radio, Justin changed the formation towards the end. Both goals were scored towards the end... ;)
Maybe, but you lost all credibility in my eye after you had Porter lined up to play as a winger in one of the team line up topics on here! ;)Dukes wrote:Yes, but only because JE got the first team to sign and vote...Mad Dog wrote:4-3-3 is winning then.;)
I was right in line with that, fantastic ball. If Charles could produce moments like that over 90 then he'd be a hell of a player. Unfortunately he can only manage the odd 20 minutes here and there.Sara Pascoe wrote:What a ball from Charles for the winner by the way, even Farrell couldn't miss that one!
Let's face it, Brazil with the quality and skill of their players could adopt any system in the coaching manuals and still win 95% of the matches that they play. ;)Dukes wrote:Just read that the new manager of Brazil (Mano Menezes) has stated that he will not play 4-3-3 again .......