Page 2 of 3

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:36 pm
by Mad Dog
4-3-3 is winning then.

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:43 pm
by HiHoRushden&Diamonds
According to the radio, Justin changed the formation towards the end. Both goals were scored towards the end... ;)

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:46 pm
by Dukes
Mad Dog wrote:4-3-3 is winning then.
Yes, but only because JE got the first team to sign and vote... :D ;)

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:05 pm
by Mad Dog
HiHoRushden&Diamonds wrote:According to the radio, Justin changed the formation towards the end. Both goals were scored towards the end... ;)
Eh? Didn't look like it watching it in person, was very much 4-3-3 throughout.
Dukes wrote:
Mad Dog wrote:4-3-3 is winning then.
Yes, but only because JE got the first team to sign and vote... :D ;)
Maybe, but you lost all credibility in my eye after you had Porter lined up to play as a winger in one of the team line up topics on here! ;)

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:52 pm
by Dukes
Mad Dog wrote:
HiHoRushden&Diamonds wrote:According to the radio, Justin changed the formation towards the end. Both goals were scored towards the end... ;)
Eh? Didn't look like it watching it in person, was very much 4-3-3 throughout.
Dukes wrote:
Mad Dog wrote:4-3-3 is winning then.
Yes, but only because JE got the first team to sign and vote... :D ;)
Maybe, but you lost all credibility in my eye after you had Porter lined up to play as a winger in one of the team line up topics on here! ;)
Had to put someoned out there - only seem to have one wide player at the moment in Charles. - by the way he's the one that voted for 4-4-2.. :D

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:05 am
by Bob's Bitch
What a ball from Charles for the winner by the way, even Farrell couldn't miss that one! :)

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:10 am
by BartonRaz
Sara Pascoe wrote:What a ball from Charles for the winner by the way, even Farrell couldn't miss that one! :)
I was right in line with that, fantastic ball. If Charles could produce moments like that over 90 then he'd be a hell of a player. Unfortunately he can only manage the odd 20 minutes here and there.

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:23 am
by Olly
Currently 15 votes for 4-4-2 and 15 votes for 4-3-3!

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 12:06 am
by Dukes
Just read that the new manager of Brazil (Mano Menezes) has stated that he will not play 4-3-3 again - he would rather cut his wrists...!
Apparently he's fed up with narrow play, unexciting football and being too predictable for opposing defences.

He states that
'Playing 4-4-2 is the answer, it may be old fashioned but it gets results and supporters have exciting football to watch and shout about - this is how we will be World Champions again!'

He went on to say ...
'This system is proven, the players like it and the fans love it - they get behind the team because we score goals, they become the part of the team - they are the 12th man!'

Don't you just love that Latin passion....

Regards, Dukes ;)

Re: 4-4-2 or 4-3-3

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 7:29 am
by Trek
Dukes wrote:Just read that the new manager of Brazil (Mano Menezes) has stated that he will not play 4-3-3 again .......
Let's face it, Brazil with the quality and skill of their players could adopt any system in the coaching manuals and still win 95% of the matches that they play. ;)