Page 2 of 3
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:36 pm
by sussexdiamond
Sid, You will probably agree though that 21 is a daft number of teams to make up a division.
I think they could have quite easily have promoted an extra team last season.
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:12 pm
by SouthRushdenJFC
sussexdiamond wrote:I think they could have quite easily have promoted an extra team last season.
The Oadby chairman probably still thinks they were promoted
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:25 pm
by Brownie
Let Eynesbury come up, nice Club good pitch & how much would it p..s Oadby off to know top 3 would have got them up :lol: as you say though they probably think they are up.
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:21 pm
by Sid
Blackstones lost their appeal, according to UCLs facebook page.
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:45 pm
by Trek
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:44 am
by TheIncognitoKid
On what grounds did they think they could stay up? Your relegated for a reason and that is because your not good enough for the league you've just competed in!
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:17 am
by Basil
TheIncognitoKid wrote:On what grounds did they think they could stay up? Your relegated for a reason and that is because your not good enough for the league you've just competed in!
They said that they spent all their money (£20,000) on enforced upgrading of their ground and therefore had no money left to strengthen their squad!!! Talk about clutching at straws!!!
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:21 pm
by TheIncognitoKid
Where are Blackstones based anyway?
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:24 pm
by Trek
TheIncognitoKid wrote:Where are Blackstones based anyway?
Stamford
Re: Blackstones...
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:09 pm
by Sid
Someone has moaned on UCL Chatter (didn't think anyone still posted on there

) that S&L should have been demoted, as they have not done required work, and Blackstones reprieved.