The unofficial AFC Rushden & Diamonds messageboard

Of course the conspiracy theorists might think they've done that so its easy to add in an alternative letter when required.

Formic wrote:Of course the conspiracy theorists might think they've done that so its easy to add in an alternative letter when required.

Will somebody give me an N ;)

I'll play :lol:

Pigman wrote:

Formic wrote:Of course the conspiracy theorists might think they've done that so its easy to add in an alternative letter when required.

Will somebody give me an N ;)

I'll play :lol:

Vowel please, Rachel! ;)

Interesting rumour on the Non-League Matters Forum. Surely not?

http://www.nonleaguematters.co.uk/forum ... t=13010851

Well Max has got an extra 50 million for his sale of Doc Martens recently, must be burning a hole in his pocket and seeing his baby he built being turned into a turd hole by KC he might well have succumbed to nostalgia.

Hey it gives us something gossip and muse over in the close season, if true well it would be a shocker

Biggles wrote:Well Max has got an extra 50 million for his sale of Doc Martens recently:

According the recent Sunday Times Rich List Max and Stephen's wealth increased by £73m over the previous year's figures and they have retained 20% of the Griggs Group.

What would be the point though?

K*ttering - obviously not
Corby - nope
Us - couldn't afford it + it's way too big and is hard to get to.
Northampton - developing their ground
Coventry - no public travel links from Coventry.

Sounds like a silly rumour to me.

im all in for the pitch 2 debate,,,nice little set up,,,may be up to ucl std.plenty of parking,use strikers bar ,take our stand etc etc,.pay rent to whoever/or purchase the ground,,,,,,,all it needs is changing rooms

Bob's Bitch wrote:What would be the point though?

Max to return the facility to the local community via new Trust, which I've always maintained he should have done in the first place when passing RDFC to the old Trust in April 2005.
KC to cut his losses and get rid of a facility that not's producing much income, apart from car boot sales, and costing him monthly ongoing expenditure such as business rates and utility payments etc.

Trek wrote:

Bob's Bitch wrote:What would be the point though?

Max to return the facility to the local community via new Trust, which I've always maintained he should have done in the first place when passing RDFC to the old Trust in April 2005.
KC to cut his losses and get rid of a facility that not's producing much income, apart from car boot sales, and costing him monthly ongoing expenditure such as business rates and utility payments etc.

How would this be financed?