The unofficial AFC Rushden & Diamonds messageboard
https://www.afcdiamondsforum.uk/
Pete wrote:You are entitled to your opinion, of course, but to say that it would be unfair not to have video highlights suggests perhaps we have got used to having an outstanding general media service/package, and all for free.
Agree with those comments Dowlo.Dowlo wrote: Not only that as already mentioned, it gives the club exposure and the ability for fans to relive great moments. Aaron Kings screamer v Oadby, The Spencer Celebrations, Gilly's over head kick, Alfie's scoring the clubs 1st ever senior goal, Paul Stanyer's howlers in the Dale Memorial cup game, the FA Cup runs and THAT Barwell equaliser. All captured on video to relive over and over again! Without AFCR&D TV they'd all be consigned to people's memory only, and some people may have never got to have seen them. With a list like that I'm sure people wouldn't mind paying a small fee for it to continue (if that's what is needed to happen). I and many others I'm sure would be gutted if AFCR&D was to stop completely.
Formic wrote:If you want to back up your opinion I am sure it will be welcomed if you are prepared to get along to every game, spend the time filming the game, spend the time after the game editing it down to a highlights package, then spend the time uploading it to youtube and the OWS - if you can do all of that then your opinion that it should remain as it is will be achievable.updiamonds wrote:Pete wrote:
The point is that isn't an option. It just takes up too much resource.
This person has asked for are thoughts/opinions over it, and I've given a opinion over it, just like other people, to me charging people (basic service, as in goals) is harsh/not fair on fans who can't make games. But like ParcelFace says Charging for extras is good, like interviews. And will bring in extra money for the club, also people watching the goals (might very well) what more of a service, so (ie more) will be willing to pay.
Read the first line, gauge opinions over AFCRDTV.
And I have just given a opinion.
I think there is a misunderstanding here somewhere. In order for it to stay as it is (i.e excellent coverage provided for free), it needs someone to do all of the necessary work as I've described in the same way as it has been done for the past four seasons. It appears there is nobody willing / able to do this, so options are being considered which will mean the same services as are currently provided might need to be chargeable.updiamonds wrote:Formic wrote:If you want to back up your opinion I am sure it will be welcomed if you are prepared to get along to every game, spend the time filming the game, spend the time after the game editing it down to a highlights package, then spend the time uploading it to youtube and the OWS - if you can do all of that then your opinion that it should remain as it is will be achievable.updiamonds wrote:
This person has asked for are thoughts/opinions over it, and I've given a opinion over it, just like other people, to me charging people (basic service, as in goals) is harsh/not fair on fans who can't make games. But like ParcelFace says Charging for extras is good, like interviews. And will bring in extra money for the club, also people watching the goals (might very well) what more of a service, so (ie more) will be willing to pay.
Read the first line, gauge opinions over AFCRDTV.
And I have just given a opinion.
Why do you be like that for, I stated about charging for it, extras, (interviews etc etc) making extra income/money for the club. So why say it like that.
ps I have volunteered for things before, and when I choice to volunteer for things, (that I love) I don't suspect to get a penny for it.
Formic wrote:I think there is a misunderstanding here somewhere. In order for it to stay as it is (i.e excellent coverage provided for free), it needs someone to do all of the necessary work as I've described in the same way as it has been done for the past four seasons. It appears there is nobody willing / able to do this, so options are being considered which will mean the same services as are currently provided might need to be chargeable.updiamonds wrote:Formic wrote:
If you want to back up your opinion I am sure it will be welcomed if you are prepared to get along to every game, spend the time filming the game, spend the time after the game editing it down to a highlights package, then spend the time uploading it to youtube and the OWS - if you can do all of that then your opinion that it should remain as it is will be achievable.
Why do you be like that for, I stated about charging for it, extras, (interviews etc etc) making extra income/money for the club. So why say it like that.
ps I have volunteered for things before, and when I choice to volunteer for things, (that I love) I don't suspect to get a penny for it.
I'm sure we'd all like to vote for "no change" - but that isn't an option.