Almost all phoenix clubs (not AFC Wimbledon) are in the same boat though, the old club has lived beyond it's means and gone bust leaving a string of creditors and a lot of bad feeling. However as far as I am aware none have had radical name changes in order to pretend that they are totally unconnected in any way. I fail to see the point of setting up a club that does not include both "Rushden" and "Diamonds" in it's name and acknowledge that it was set up by those that previously supported the club with a similar name from Nene Park.Biggles wrote:The problem being that wider community has not been supporting Rushden and Diamonds in the last few years.Mad Dog wrote:I stand by my belief that a phoenix club with 'Rushden' and 'Diamonds' in it's name can become a success and draw upon support in the wider community. It's about a club's relationship with it's fans and community and the connection with the team on the pitch that matters most.
The club has now been tainted with fraud and corruption it does not matter if its true or not as we all know MUD STICKS and how much you scrub youself down that Mud never seems to go away.
So to just add AFC to the name of Rushden and Diamonds will in a lot of cases not even be noticed and as TOD states many will feel its the same club run by the same people.
Just because we on this forum follow whats going on and know the reasons behind our demise many do not and if you read other reports many state we are in a financial mess caused by years of overspending by fat cat owners.
Rather than start a club with some awful name like East Northants United, I would prefer that we voted to follow another local side Wellingborough Town (average attendance 107) or Raunds Town (ave 72) would be totally transformed by an extra 3-400 fans and would be back in the Southern League in 3-4 years.