Re: [ Sat Oct 11th ] v Oadby Town, KO 3pm UCLP HOME
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:10 pm
like last week, i thought the opposition were good going forwards. a win's a win. coyw
The unofficial AFC Rushden & Diamonds messageboard
https://www.afcdiamondsforum.uk/
Yeah, definitely, Dunks's consistency in the air is quite remarkable at times for this level and I hope him and Gearing have only been rested the last few games because of the relatively weak opposition, cause while Tom and Elliot have done well over the last few weeks and worked hard, I'd still start Dunks and Gearing ahead of them any day really and hopefully those 2 will be getting more gametime in the next few weeks, especially with midweek games coming up.TheIncognitoKid wrote:I would add Dunks to that as well, always a threat, proved it today. Tom Lorraine works his socks off but doesn't cause the problems Russell Dunkley does.Pigman wrote:
Desborough on Tuesday to focus on now - for me, Sam and Matty to start, the rest the same.
paulg wrote:Fairly straight forward 3-0 win - we were too strong for them but it was a shame to see the lads back off in the 2nd half and ease their way through it. Fair enough we were 2-0 up but I thought it represented a good opportunity to bag more goals as we bid to increase attendances. Peaks could have made changes earlier I thought as we were looking pretty stale.
Still, a win's a win and we kept a clean sheet so well done to the lads
Yes he should, not that I would agree but an argument can be made if the keeper makes an effort to stop his momentum and/or releases the ball as soon as he realises he's outside the area. Neither happened so by the letter of the law he should have gone, even if John Cleese considered it only a yellow, thenSouthRushdenJFC wrote: Should the goalie have gone for handball?
I agree I thought their two central midfielders were good, perhaps a couple that have hung around from last season. As a whole they were better than their league position suggests.SouthRushdenJFC wrote:The two lads in centre midfield excepted Oddby were woeful. We didn't need to get out of second gear, so didn't bother.
Should the goalie have gone for handball?
No, yellow card for that IMO, but he should have gone for kicking the ball away immediately afterwards - 2 yellows !!SouthRushdenJFC wrote: Should the goalie have gone for handball?
I'm still not sure Dunks is 100% match fit, plus Tom has been scoring goals, but I see what you're getting at - Peaksy will know the right time to throw Dunks into the fray - he took his goal well today didn't he?TheIncognitoKid wrote:I would add Dunks to that as well, always a threat, proved it today. Tom Lorraine works his socks off but doesn't cause the problems Russell Dunkley does.Pigman wrote:
Desborough on Tuesday to focus on now - for me, Sam and Matty to start, the rest the same.
Very well, was really impressed with his ability there. Physicality caused Oadby problems all day, shame we didn't have the right players on the pitch at the start to really exploit thatPigman wrote:I'm still not sure Dunks is 100% match fit, plus Tom has been scoring goals, but I see what you're getting at - Peaksy will know the right time to throw Dunks into the fray - he took his goal well today didn't he?TheIncognitoKid wrote:I would add Dunks to that as well, always a threat, proved it today. Tom Lorraine works his socks off but doesn't cause the problems Russell Dunkley does.Pigman wrote:
Desborough on Tuesday to focus on now - for me, Sam and Matty to start, the rest the same.