The unofficial AFC Rushden & Diamonds messageboard

Biggles wrote:
Paul Hart did win his case againt us and we paid him 28k and we paid 80k in legal costs.

WHAT THE FECK.

That is incredibly irritating.

Just when I thought I couldn't hate the man any more. :evil: :evil: :evil: :x

Harry wrote:

Biggles wrote:
Paul Hart did win his case againt us and we paid him 28k and we paid 80k in legal costs.

WHAT THE FECK.

That is incredibly irritating.

Just when I thought I couldn't hate the man any more. :evil: :evil: :evil: :x

I know completely shocking! The one thing i will say, is that i'm most certainly no legal expert, but those legal costs are quite high! I would suggest it probably means he's appealed enough times, which imo is even worse!

Still think if we had that time again (God please no), but i think the club would have done the same thing, and was definately the right move at the time, irrespective of this decision. For me, we would have been in an even bigger mess if he'd have stayed, imo.