The unofficial AFC Rushden & Diamonds messageboard

therushden wrote:charles came on as sub and should have been sharper than most on the field. i don't see his work rate as being high enough.

Charles does not even look like a footballer, let alone cut it at this level.
When we signed him from Luton a ticket holding Luton mate of mine had never heard of him.
In my mind if he ain't good enough for them he ain't good enough for us!

SCARECROW wrote:

therushden wrote:charles came on as sub and should have been sharper than most on the field. i don't see his work rate as being high enough.

Charles does not even look like a footballer, let alone cut it at this level.
When we signed him from Luton a ticket holding Luton mate of mine had never heard of him.
In my mind if he ain't good enough for them he ain't good enough for us!

So by that logic we would never have signed Azza two years ago from Mansfield. :roll:

O Conner at least had a track record as a striker in the conference before he came here, Charles level is certainly not in the conference.

SCARECROW wrote:O Conner at least had a track record as a striker in the conference before he came here, Charles level is certainly not in the conference.

I personally think he's got a lot of potential and has a fantastic work ethic. I think he will do well if given time to develop.

It's all about opinions at the end of the day.

Mad Dog wrote:

SCARECROW wrote:O Conner at least had a track record as a striker in the conference before he came here, Charles level is certainly not in the conference.

I personally think he's got a lot of potential and has a fantastic work ethic. I think he will do well if given time to develop.

It's all about opinions at the end of the day.

He's shown glimpses of ability and deserves at least till the end of the season. I think he's ok for this league and he is still quite young