Page 4 of 4

Re: Your Fan Rating...

Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 12:42 pm
by rudolph_hucker
What is the point of this thread? Is it to prove A is a better fan than B? If so its a rubbish idea as I'd have attended all of the home games except the necessity to pay my mortgage and actually work on many of our night time (and B/H) games, I also have a whole new raft of family commitments that reduce my ability to get away often. Does that mean I'm a worse supporter than someone with more free disposable time?

Re: Your Fan Rating...

Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:17 pm
by TheIncognitoKid
rudolph_hucker wrote:What is the point of this thread? Is it to prove A is a better fan than B? If so its a rubbish idea as I'd have attended all of the home games except the necessity to pay my mortgage and actually work on many of our night time (and B/H) games, I also have a whole new raft of family commitments that reduce my ability to get away often. Does that mean I'm a worse supporter than someone with more free disposable time?
If you like! ;)

Re: Your Fan Rating...

Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:24 pm
by Diamond_ Wolf
rudolph_hucker wrote:What is the point of this thread? Is it to prove A is a better fan than B? If so its a rubbish idea as I'd have attended all of the home games except the necessity to pay my mortgage and actually work on many of our night time (and B/H) games, I also have a whole new raft of family commitments that reduce my ability to get away often. Does that mean I'm a worse supporter than someone with more free disposable time?
No one is questioning anyones commitment, some people have more reponsibilities/ free time than others. Im lucky as i have plenty of free time at weekends and a reasonable disposable income as i have few commitments.

Re: Your Fan Rating...

Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 3:52 pm
by dracos3
57!

Re: Your Fan Rating...

Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 3:57 pm
by Oundle Diamond #2
rudolph_hucker wrote:What is the point of this thread? Is it to prove A is a better fan than B? If so its a rubbish idea as I'd have attended all of the home games except the necessity to pay my mortgage and actually work on many of our night time (and B/H) games, I also have a whole new raft of family commitments that reduce my ability to get away often. Does that mean I'm a worse supporter than someone with more free disposable time?
I would agree if anyone on here was under the illusion that this actually defines you as a better/worse fan.

Re: Your Fan Rating...

Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 6:02 pm
by rdfcbrownie-az-o-c
59 not bad considering I dont work, surely bath away on a Tuesday night deserves 3 ;) that would edge me on to 60

Re: Your Fan Rating...

Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 6:05 pm
by rdfcbrownie-az-o-c
Are we really counting ore-season (but I appreciate devon)

Re: Your Fan Rating...

Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 8:57 pm
by rudolph_hucker
TheIncognitoKid wrote:
rudolph_hucker wrote:What is the point of this thread? Is it to prove A is a better fan than B? If so its a rubbish idea as I'd have attended all of the home games except the necessity to pay my mortgage and actually work on many of our night time (and B/H) games, I also have a whole new raft of family commitments that reduce my ability to get away often. Does that mean I'm a worse supporter than someone with more free disposable time?
If you like! ;)
I like