Page 5 of 7

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:51 am
by Trek
OundleDiamond wrote:I'd definitely take McAllister back.
Wasn't he a bit of a sick note like Wolleaston?

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:56 am
by BartonRaz
McAllister was great with Jackson but he didn't contribute enough goals himself. Could work well with O'Connor.

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:44 am
by Jemfy
I never rated MacAllister to be honest. Thought we were lucky others wanted him at the time, and we got away with it.

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:58 pm
by Downsie53
deal off now according to ET. gutted, was meant to be 99% done....

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:00 pm
by The Godfather
"But a proposed move for one of his top targets broke down yesterday when Diamonds had looked certain to complete the deal with a Coca-Cola League One club.

Edinburgh explained: "It's off now and I'm not going to pursue it.
"I pulled out for one or two reasons which weren't financial but I'm not going into full details."


Stuart

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:13 pm
by Trek
StuartRDFC wrote: Edinburgh explained: "It's off now and I'm not going to pursue it.
"I pulled out for one or two reasons which weren't financial but I'm not going into full details."
Sounds like it could have McAllister and Justin found out about his dodgy knees, back etc. etc. :lol:

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:42 pm
by BartonRaz
Greatttttt.

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:51 pm
by OundleDiamond
:(

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:36 pm
by Harry
FFS, came on excited about seeing who we had signed. :(

Re: New Striker

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:44 pm
by jimbobjaw
Harry wrote:FFS, came on excited about seeing who we had signed. :(
Looks like we might have to put up with Sam Smith then :wink: