Slightly worried?
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:54 am
That with just over a month until the new season we still have no shirt sponsor, the photos from the game last night highlighted that fact to me with the blank shirt :?
The unofficial AFC Rushden & Diamonds messageboard
https://www.afcdiamondsforum.uk/
Potential loss of income, I agree, but I guess KC isn't going to give it away for nothing. Didn't West Brom play for a season without shirt sponsorship?Rushdenjim wrote:That with just over a month until the new season we still have no shirt sponsor, the photos from the game last night highlighted that fact to me with the blank shirt :?
I wouldn't, and I'm sure KC wouldn't either! We may have had to take them to court to get the money but they still paid it eventually.Trek wrote:Potential loss of income, I agree, but I guess KC isn't going to give it away for nothing. Didn't West Brom play for a season without shirt sponsorship?Rushdenjim wrote:That with just over a month until the new season we still have no shirt sponsor, the photos from the game last night highlighted that fact to me with the blank shirt :?
Do you have the same worry when you see empty spaces for advertising boards around the ground?
Many small businesses are struggling in the current financial climate and I rather see no shirt sponser than one like Haart who defaults on agreed payment terms!
In business you should only get into bed with someone who is going to honour the agreement.davealbon wrote:
I wouldn't, and I'm sure KC wouldn't either! We may have had to take them to court to get the money but they still paid it eventually.
Two seasons actually, they had a deal in place and their chairman messed up (according to my baggies supporting mate).Trek wrote:Potential loss of income, I agree, but I guess KC isn't going to give it away for nothing. Didn't West Brom play for a season without shirt sponsorship?Rushdenjim wrote:That with just over a month until the new season we still have no shirt sponsor, the photos from the game last night highlighted that fact to me with the blank shirt :?
Don't mix buisness with pleasure son! ;)Trek wrote:In business you should only get into bed with someone who is going to honour the agreement.davealbon wrote:
I wouldn't, and I'm sure KC wouldn't either! We may have had to take them to court to get the money but they still paid it eventually.
Get onto Waitrose ;)Hayden wrote:Someone pop into Subway! ;)