What a load of ........
What a load of ........
codswallup.....
As KC informed us at the meeting on Tuesday, the Conference supremos will not permit clubs in the same league to groundshare. When are they going to get their heads out of their own backsides? The way things are going there will be very few clubs in the lower leagues (not just R&D and K*ttering) that will be able to afford to carry on managing their own grounds etc. As KC informed us that the utility bills alone come to £10K a month (eg. water, gas, electric). Even in Leagues 1 and 2, some clubs groundshare with Rugby clubs and they admit they would not be in existance if it wasn't for groundsharing.
Hopefully some Conference bod reads this forum and will realise that if they don't soon change their attitude they will soon destroy the feeder league system that no doubt pays their salaries. I repeat, I am not talking about mergers here but common sense ground sharing that in my opinion would help save many clubs that are on the breadline.
As KC informed us at the meeting on Tuesday, the Conference supremos will not permit clubs in the same league to groundshare. When are they going to get their heads out of their own backsides? The way things are going there will be very few clubs in the lower leagues (not just R&D and K*ttering) that will be able to afford to carry on managing their own grounds etc. As KC informed us that the utility bills alone come to £10K a month (eg. water, gas, electric). Even in Leagues 1 and 2, some clubs groundshare with Rugby clubs and they admit they would not be in existance if it wasn't for groundsharing.
Hopefully some Conference bod reads this forum and will realise that if they don't soon change their attitude they will soon destroy the feeder league system that no doubt pays their salaries. I repeat, I am not talking about mergers here but common sense ground sharing that in my opinion would help save many clubs that are on the breadline.
Re: What a load of ........
I have to say a ground share makes perfect sense.
Even if you lived in K*ttering, Nene Park is only 20 minutes away.
Two teams playing here would be the best way of paying the big overheads, plus it would be pretty funny siting in the Airwair as an "away fan".
If the Giants and Jets can share a stadium in New York or Inter and AC in Milian then two teams in the football conference should have no problems.
God, you could even sell the ground rights for a few pounds to appease the Poppies so they don't have to play at Nene Park, - "something" Community Stadium
Even if you lived in K*ttering, Nene Park is only 20 minutes away.
Two teams playing here would be the best way of paying the big overheads, plus it would be pretty funny siting in the Airwair as an "away fan".
If the Giants and Jets can share a stadium in New York or Inter and AC in Milian then two teams in the football conference should have no problems.
God, you could even sell the ground rights for a few pounds to appease the Poppies so they don't have to play at Nene Park, - "something" Community Stadium
-
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:50 pm
- Location: London
-
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:50 pm
Re: What a load of ........
Has anyone approached the subject of the naming rights to the Stadium??
I feel sorry for people who don't drink................when they wake up in the morning, that's the best they're going to feel all day.
Re: What a load of ........
I've just had a call from the PR and Media Director of the Football Conference regarding the statement on this thread which he had seen.
He would like me to put things straight by advising that in fact there is no Conference rule preventing ground sharing - even if both clubs are in the same league. Hayes & Yeading would have had this situation had Woking gained promotion.
He confirmed that the three factors that do apply are that there must be an approved contract / lease in place between the two clubs, the ground must meet the grading criteria, and that clubs cannot take advantage of ground sharing in order to avoid relegation or gain promotion.
He would like me to put things straight by advising that in fact there is no Conference rule preventing ground sharing - even if both clubs are in the same league. Hayes & Yeading would have had this situation had Woking gained promotion.
He confirmed that the three factors that do apply are that there must be an approved contract / lease in place between the two clubs, the ground must meet the grading criteria, and that clubs cannot take advantage of ground sharing in order to avoid relegation or gain promotion.
-
- Posts: 5824
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:56 pm
- Location: Irthlingborough
- Has Liked: 5 times
- Been Liked: 178 times
Re: What a load of ........
I'm going to guess that we all heard the same thing at the forum given that a few of us have now ratified what was said by KC regarding the issue of groundsharing.Formic wrote:I've just had a call from the PR and Media Director of the Football Conference regarding the statement on this thread which he had seen.
He would like me to put things straight by advising that in fact there is no Conference rule preventing ground sharing - even if both clubs are in the same league. Hayes & Yeading would have had this situation had Woking gained promotion.
He confirmed that the three factors that do apply are that there must be an approved contract / lease in place between the two clubs, the ground must meet the grading criteria, and that clubs cannot take advantage of ground sharing in order to avoid relegation or gain promotion.
Could it be argued that K*ttering are looking to groundshare to avoid relegation? This MAY have been what KC meant.
They say we've lost our money we're not famous anymore.....
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: Rushden
- Has Liked: 10 times
- Been Liked: 53 times
Re: What a load of ........
If I remember rightly, KC didn't say the Conference won't allow two sides in the same division to ground share, but rather they don't like it. There is a big difference.
We all know that there is no consistency whatsoever when it comes to the Conference board, and that they pretty much make things up as they go along. So just because a ground share isn't against their rules it still doesn't mean they would allow it. Even if it helped one, maybe two, of its members survive. :roll:
We all know that there is no consistency whatsoever when it comes to the Conference board, and that they pretty much make things up as they go along. So just because a ground share isn't against their rules it still doesn't mean they would allow it. Even if it helped one, maybe two, of its members survive. :roll:
AFC Rushden & Diamonds Member No. 297
Re: What a load of ........
For both sets of fans, probably me included 10 - 12 years ago, the thought of the Poppies calling Nene Park home would / will fill them with anger and hatred.
Personally, in these current financial times, I can’t help but think that this is truly a once in a lifetime opportunity to save two local football clubs.
The more I think about it, the more the idea makes sense.
I think there is a stigma about ground sharing but to me it makes perfect business sense.
What better way to sweat the facilities when two teams call Nene Park home.
Every football club in the county looks at ways of utilising its facilities on non match days, what better way of safe guarding the Diamonds and Poppies futures by having 50 plus match days at Nene Park.
Personally, in these current financial times, I can’t help but think that this is truly a once in a lifetime opportunity to save two local football clubs.
The more I think about it, the more the idea makes sense.
I think there is a stigma about ground sharing but to me it makes perfect business sense.
What better way to sweat the facilities when two teams call Nene Park home.
Every football club in the county looks at ways of utilising its facilities on non match days, what better way of safe guarding the Diamonds and Poppies futures by having 50 plus match days at Nene Park.
Re: What a load of ........
Disagree Dave. I sat in the front row on Tuesday and i,ll swear KC did say what I quoted in the 1st post, if he didn,t (and I am an old git and partially deaf ) I heartily apologise. Anyone else hear what he said ?. :?davealbon wrote:If I remember rightly, KC didn't say the Conference won't allow two sides in the same division to ground share, but rather they don't like it. There is a big difference.
We all know that there is no consistency whatsoever when it comes to the Conference board, and that they pretty much make things up as they go along. So just because a ground share isn't against their rules it still doesn't mean they would allow it. Even if it helped one, maybe two, of its members survive. :roll:
-
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:00 pm
Re: What a load of ........
I'm pretty sure davealbon is correct, KC never said they won't allow it, just that they don't like it so therfore it is likely to be difficult for it to happen especially because the two clubs are in the same league.diamondal wrote:Disagree Dave. I sat in the front row on Tuesday and i,ll swear KC did say what I quoted in the 1st post, if he didn,t (and I am an old git and partially deaf ) I heartily apologise. Anyone else hear what he said ?. :?davealbon wrote:If I remember rightly, KC didn't say the Conference won't allow two sides in the same division to ground share, but rather they don't like it. There is a big difference.
We all know that there is no consistency whatsoever when it comes to the Conference board, and that they pretty much make things up as they go along. So just because a ground share isn't against their rules it still doesn't mean they would allow it. Even if it helped one, maybe two, of its members survive. :roll: