[ Sat 5th Oct ] v Bromsgrove Sporting, KO 3pm SLPDC HOME

[rossco]

This was the first game I've managed to get to this season, l was not disappointed with the match, only the end result. I don't know how the ref thought Reynolds deserved a red card, but, we didn't readjust to cope with the loss of a player. And Ashton was reckless with that sort of challenge, knowing the refs attitude and deserved to be sent off. The heads went and we were treated to a goal feast, albeit to them. Also, l got in at a bargain price, l gave £15 and was handed £9 change, happy days.
See you next week.

As others have said... why post this on here? £11 isn’t exactly a lot for 90 mins of football anyway. Trust you’ll pay the extra £5 you owe next week?

[Brownie]

Should have owned up and been honest and handed the money back. Club needs all the money it can get.

Agreed.

Strange place to boast

Agree, put on another forum someone made a mistake and you got in cheep but on your own forum though if 1st game this season perhaps this is another clubs forum.

[SouthRushdenJFC]

With ten goals no doubt he'll pay double next time

[rushdenman]

Having watched the video I think Zac was a little unlucky with the red card.
Their guy slid in with his leg on the ground and got to the ball fractionally before Zac would have done so Zac's momentum meant he caught their player's lower leg, on the ground, about halfway up his calf.
It was not off the ground and there was no intent, so I think a yellow was probably more appropriate. However, I can see why the ref thought a red was deserved as he only saw it once at full speed.
Might be worth an appeal on the video evidence.
Absolutely no complaints about Jack's red card. It was high, late and out of control.

[davealbon]

Having watched the video I think Zac was a little unlucky with the red card.
Their guy slid in with his leg on the ground and got to the ball fractionally before Zac would have done so Zac's momentum meant he caught their player's lower leg, on the ground, about halfway up his calf.
It was not off the ground and there was no intent, so I think a yellow was probably more appropriate. However, I can see why the ref thought a red was deserved as he only saw it once at full speed.
Might be worth an appeal on the video evidence.
Absolutely no complaints about Jack's red card. It was high, late and out of control.

The other thing with Zack's red was that the player came from behind him; Zack wouldn't have even seen him when he went for the ball. Absolutely no point appealing it though; I think the only red we've appealed previously was Brownie's at Wisbech when the video clearly showed he'd won the ball, and we still didn't get that overturned.

[Brownie]

Having watched the video I think Zac was a little unlucky with the red card.
Their guy slid in with his leg on the ground and got to the ball fractionally before Zac would have done so Zac's momentum meant he caught their player's lower leg, on the ground, about halfway up his calf.
It was not off the ground and there was no intent, so I think a yellow was probably more appropriate. However, I can see why the ref thought a red was deserved as he only saw it once at full speed.
Might be worth an appeal on the video evidence.
Absolutely no complaints about Jack's red card. It was high, late and out of control.

The other thing with Zack's red was that the player came from behind him; Zack wouldn't have even seen him when he went for the ball. Absolutely no point appealing it though; I think the only red we've appealed previously was Brownie's at Wisbech when the video clearly showed he'd won the ball, and we still didn't get that overturned.

Like Dave says Zac was nearest to the ball and looking at it, their player came in from behind and would struggle to claim he was in control, I didn't even see it as a card, or if it was it was yellow to the Bromsgrove player. The second one was never in question totally ridiculous challenge in any circumstances which if the player had his foot down and studs planted could have resulted in serious injury.

[train]

Zak got fouled just before that incident from behind, (he didn't go down like a sack load of potatoes) he stayed up, a foul is a foul. 3:26 bit, look.

Should have been a foul to us, nowhere near a red card.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Iv2z5qACKdM

[rushdenman]

Zak got fouled just before that incident from behind, (he didn't go down like a sack load of potatoes) he stayed up, a foul is a foul. 3:26 bit, look.

Should have been a foul to us, nowhere near a red card.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Iv2z5qACKdM

The difference is that Zac didn't go down like a squealing pig.

[TheIncognitoKid]

Zak got fouled just before that incident from behind, (he didn't go down like a sack load of potatoes) he stayed up, a foul is a foul. 3:26 bit, look.

Should have been a foul to us, nowhere near a red card.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Iv2z5qACKdM

That's a hard watch watching that back. A dark day for the club on the pitch. Having seen it back, I've no arguments over ashton's red. It's a dangerous challenge and he will know better than most that a lunge in like that is unacceptable. Reynolds however is a yellow at most, he wouldn't have even seen the guy coming in behind him. But it's done now and we move on, just a shame a redult like that is forever in the history books.

[Dazzler]