[ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
-
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:50 pm
- Location: Rushden
- Has Liked: 101 times
- Been Liked: 17 times
Re: [ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
The statement is far too wishy to explain this huge decision, which will do significant reputational damage to the club.
Last edited by Rushdenjim on Sat Oct 28, 2023 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 5:26 pm
- Has Liked: 25 times
- Been Liked: 65 times
Re: [ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
Have to agree here. This seems like a big decision and is likely (and already has looking at Twitter) gotten some negative backlash. Could we/ the part owners get an update on this because if I remember correctly we were told that the u23s was self sustaining / self funded. Please correct me if I’m wrong.Rushdenjim wrote: Sat Oct 28, 2023 4:56 am The statement is far too wishy to explain this huge decision, which will do significantly reputational damage to the club.
Lee Tomlin la la la
Re: [ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
The statement that the Academy was fully self funded was announced at the AGM and confirmed byway of the slides that were made available to the Part Owners???rickthediamond wrote: Sat Oct 28, 2023 7:43 amHave to agree here. This seems like a big decision and is likely (and already has looking at Twitter) gotten some negative backlash. Could we/ the part owners get an update on this because if I remember correctly we were told that the u23s was self sustaining / self funded. Please correct me if I’m wrong.Rushdenjim wrote: Sat Oct 28, 2023 4:56 am The statement is far too wishy to explain this huge decision, which will do significantly reputational damage to the club.
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:05 pm
- Has Liked: 48 times
- Been Liked: 32 times
Re: [ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
It’s a crap situation but due to numerous factors, rising costs has made the model unsustainable. We’ve worked bloody hard to try make it successful but we had to have some honest and difficult conversations over the last month to protect the overall pathway
-
- Posts: 3582
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:26 pm
- Has Liked: 1 time
- Been Liked: 67 times
Re: [ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
Setting the financial aspect aside. I have never understood the need for u23's. Surely any half decent player over 21 should be looking to play Step 5 football at least.
-
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:25 pm
- Has Liked: 47 times
- Been Liked: 35 times
Re: [ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
That's another wishy washy statement.mattparker wrote: Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:03 am It’s a crap situation but due to numerous factors, rising costs has made the model unsustainable. We’ve worked bloody hard to try make it successful but we had to have some honest and difficult conversations over the last month to protect the overall pathway
Running costs in the Comb are very low, one of the cheapest for the level in the Country. Referees fees are in line with the NYSL, but with club linos. There are no other running costs unless the club choose to run with that model.
Comparing to last season the only difference, apart from the standard of the players, is the home ground. The costs incurred for renting MAA for two hours will be considerably more expensive than Islip was.
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:05 pm
- Has Liked: 48 times
- Been Liked: 32 times
Re: [ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
I respect your understanding of the Combination league with Irchester, but there is much more to it which wouldn’t be appropriate to discuss on a public forumSouthRushdenJFC wrote: Sat Oct 28, 2023 9:26 am That's another wishy washy statement.
Running costs in the Comb are very low, one of the cheapest for the level in the Country. Referees fees are in line with the NYSL, but with club linos. There are no other running costs unless the club choose to run with that model.
Comparing to last season the only difference, apart from the standard of the players, is the home ground. The costs incurred for renting MAA for two hours will be considerably more expensive than Islip was.
Re: [ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
Thanks for those efforts Matt - I'm sure it's been a very difficult period for all concerned.mattparker wrote: Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:03 am It’s a crap situation but due to numerous factors, rising costs has made the model unsustainable. We’ve worked bloody hard to try make it successful but we had to have some honest and difficult conversations over the last month to protect the overall pathway
It would be good to understand a bit more about where this leaves the pathway, notably where the Moulton U19/U23 route now sits. Is there now anything beyond the U16 Academy Team for those who don't want to / can't follow the Moulton route?
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:05 pm
- Has Liked: 48 times
- Been Liked: 32 times
Re: [ U23s / Development Squad ] Update
Thank you. Yes We fully intended to re-establish the pathway for the current group of u16s players with a team in addition with the Moulton scholarship programme.Formic wrote: Sat Oct 28, 2023 10:47 am Thanks for those efforts Matt - I'm sure it's been a very difficult period for all concerned.
It would be good to understand a bit more about where this leaves the pathway, notably where the Moulton U19/U23 route now sits. Is there now anything beyond the U16 Academy Team for those who don't want to / can't follow the Moulton route?