therushden wrote:his only problem is, he's too good in too many positions.
Usually doe's well in a position, then someone like Stuart gets suspended, he covers at centre half, Stuart returns and then he's back on the bench! :?
What makes you think that there's an apostrophe in the word "does"?
you knew what he ment tho so what does it matter?
WHEN I SANG RUSHDEN TILL I DIE I MENT IT! LONG LIVE THE AFC...
Superhans wrote:you knew what he ment tho so what does it matter?
A little bit of learning goes a long way.
It depends upon the reader doesn't it? To me it read as "Usually doe is well in a position". I, personally, laughed at it. Butt eye sp'ouse vats o'write Kos yoo now watt hi meen ? ;)
TheIncognitoKid wrote:
Usually doe's well in a position, then someone like Stuart gets suspended, he covers at centre half, Stuart returns and then he's back on the bench! :?
What makes you think that there's an apostrophe in the word "does"?
you knew what he ment tho so what does it matter?
You need to capitalise the word you at the start of that sentence.
:twisted:
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 354
You could have 140 years of no achievement, or twenty years of glorious victories, you decide.
This thread reminds me of the Student Riots/Demo last week.
One of the placards they were holding said " What about our futre". Not a very good advert for a Uni education.
I do some part time work in schools and I am amazed, nay shocked, at the spelling and grammar, even by A level students.
I don't claim to be an expert but my secondary modern education in the sixties does seem far superior to anything today.
Using so called text speak or twittering may be OK for a mobile phone when brevity is essential, but is not an acceptable form of communication when posting to the general audience.
That should put me in the Grumpy Old Men category!!
sussexdiamond wrote:This thread reminds me of the Student Riots/Demo last week.
One of the placards they were holding said " What about our futre". Not a very good advert for a Uni education.
I saw that and just assumed they were being ironic, suggesting that if they couldn't get access to higher education in the future they wouldn't be able to spell future. Have I given them too much credit? :lol:
