I think hes right, I think the irthlingborough Diamonds have a clause in the ground that does exactly what Trek describedTwo of Diamonds wrote:Does it? I don't recall hearing that before. What's your source?Trek wrote: Nene Park has a convenant in place IIRC that protects the Stadium from any other activity than community use/sport for the next 100 years or so so can't be bulldozed.
Who benefits from a merger?
-
Rushdenjim
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:50 pm
- Location: Rushden
- Has Liked: 110 times
- Been Liked: 17 times
Re: Who benefits from a merger?
-
wewantourdarbyback
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:59 pm
- Location: The south these days
Re: Who benefits from a merger?
A covenant doesn't always mean there is no hope of building on a football ground
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCain_Stadium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCain_Stadium
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 354
You could have 140 years of no achievement, or twenty years of glorious victories, you decide.
One Dale Roberts.
Twitter
You could have 140 years of no achievement, or twenty years of glorious victories, you decide.
One Dale Roberts.
Re: Who benefits from a merger?
may be imran Ladak is testing the water as he knows he can't take K*ttering any further without the ground,and with a ground share being against the rules it could be his escape route out of K*ttering and who knows maybe turn up at diamonds like i say he may be testing the water
-
Trek
- Posts: 6546
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
- Location: Cottingham
- Has Liked: 11 times
- Been Liked: 14 times
Re: Who benefits from a merger?
Indeed, but in that situation the owners of the ground went into liquidation so I guess the ground became an eyesore and an embarrassment to the local authority.wewantourdarbyback wrote:A covenant doesn't always mean there is no hope of building on a football ground
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCain_Stadium