BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

All things unofficial about AFC Rushden & Diamonds and general football talk.

Pick your favourite!

Poll ended at Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:04 pm

1
6
6%
2
1
1%
3
10
10%
4
3
3%
5
14
14%
6
3
3%
7
9
9%
8
1
1%
9
0
No votes
10
4
4%
11
0
No votes
12
35
35%
13
1
1%
14
1
1%
15
2
2%
16
0
No votes
17
11
11%
18
0
No votes
None of the above
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 101

mattreddan
Posts: 955
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:59 am

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by mattreddan »

davealbon wrote:No 'AV' system?

Just a word of warning, any badges that use the original as a basis are likely to be in breach of the existing trademark. I would suggest that 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 fall into this category.

The current trademark still exists and will potentially continue to do so even once the club is wound up.
If I'd known that I would have done something else
UttoDiamond
Posts: 725
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:00 pm
Has Liked: 7 times

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by UttoDiamond »

Number 12 - easy!
AFC R&D Member Number 444
BartonRaz
Posts: 5804
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:56 pm
Location: Irthlingborough
Has Liked: 5 times
Been Liked: 171 times

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by BartonRaz »

mattreddan wrote:
davealbon wrote:No 'AV' system?

Just a word of warning, any badges that use the original as a basis are likely to be in breach of the existing trademark. I would suggest that 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 fall into this category.

The current trademark still exists and will potentially continue to do so even once the club is wound up.
If I'd known that I would have done something else
Yes it's a shame if that's the case as you've wasted your time.

Still, it's not a definite. If I had have been told I wouldn't have included them in the vote, but if i was to delete them now the whole vote would reset.
They say we've lost our money we're not famous anymore.....

AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
Olly
Posts: 2909
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:08 pm
Has Liked: 12 times
Been Liked: 120 times

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by Olly »

Difficult decision for me, but in the end I went for 5, though I may very well change my mind when it comes to the actual vote as I'm still undecided about the phoenix.
R.I.P. Dale Roberts

AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No. 308
mattreddan
Posts: 955
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:59 am

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by mattreddan »

BartonRaz wrote:
mattreddan wrote:
davealbon wrote:No 'AV' system?

Just a word of warning, any badges that use the original as a basis are likely to be in breach of the existing trademark. I would suggest that 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 fall into this category.

The current trademark still exists and will potentially continue to do so even once the club is wound up.
If I'd known that I would have done something else
Yes it's a shame if that's the case as you've wasted your time.

Still, it's not a definite. If I had have been told I wouldn't have included them in the vote, but if i was to delete them now the whole vote would reset.
I didn't spend overly too much time on them but yeah, it was a bit of a waste if thats the case.

Surely we can ask for permissions or something if the miracle that it actually did win.

Once they are chosen are they going to be fine-tuned? because most look like they've been made on paint atm.. it would be nice to have it 3D shiney type like this..

Image
Dukes
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by Dukes »

Like 12 but 17 for me as I think the river is important in the badge - it is both the difference and the link between Rushden and Diamonds...
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by Trek »

davealbon wrote: The current trademark still exists and will potentially continue to do so even once the club is wound up.
So exactly who would spend time and effort trying to sue AFC Rushden & Diamonds for possible infringement of a trademark? Personally, I don't think the new committee would need to lose any sleep over this issue as all badges produced in this poll differ from the existing R&DFC badge in many respects.
corby diamond
Posts: 870
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:17 pm
Location: Corby
Has Liked: 5 times
Been Liked: 5 times

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by corby diamond »

It's number 12 for me, just wish it had Resurgere Ex Cineribus at the bottom then it would look quality...but either way it still gets my vote!! :D
AFC Rushden and Diamonds Membership Number - 60
Stalin
Posts: 297
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:47 am
Location: USSR

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by Stalin »

Finally got time to contribute.

Sorry I didn't have time to improve on my original design but to be fair even if I did it wouldn't have been as good as Number 12, really really like it.

Image

It ticks all the boxes for a logo, I love it.
rushdenshireelite
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:55 am

Re: BADGE OFFICIAL VOTE!

Post by rushdenshireelite »

i personally think that 12 has to be the winner! a clear change from existing R&DFC but maintains all that OUR club is about. I do think however we needed more rariety like i said before the more 'modern' badge of recent years has gone back to a classic style such as man city, sunderland etc... but you could argue that stoke, posh etc have taken the same line that we are heading for with simplicity!! either way the work, effort and even thought going into something like the badge let alone everything else is amazing!!
White, red and blue army
Locked