BADGE VOTE ROUND 1.5 - OPTION 3 Design 17

All things unofficial about AFC Rushden & Diamonds and general football talk.
Locked

Which badge design is your favourite?

Option 1
3
4%
Option 2
7
10%
Option 3
15
21%
Option 4
46
65%
 
Total votes: 71

AndyKirkup
Posts: 699
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 9:45 am
Has Liked: 2 times
Been Liked: 10 times

BADGE VOTE ROUND 1.5 - OPTION 3 Design 17

Post by AndyKirkup »

Please vote for which is your favourite nuaunce of this badge.

Some points to note about this design:

- The crossed keys should really be pointing up as per St Peter's Church (and more broadly the symbol of St Peter in general), but we've included a couple of options with them pointing down since some people asked for this.

1. Image

2. Image

3. Image

4. Image
Last edited by AndyKirkup on Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Red Dragon
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: BADGE VOTE ROUND 1.5 - OPTION 3 Design 17

Post by Red Dragon »

If you want to be heraldically accurate, you can't have a red lion on a blue background. Heraldry designates colours as either metals, tinctures, or furs. Strictly speaking, you can't place tincture against tincture, or metal against metal, or fur against fur. (There are two well-known exceptions, but they are both foreign and therefore outside the aegis of the College of Heralds - the Vatican flag is yellow and white (gold and silver), and the American flag has red stripes butting right up against the blue field upon which are the fifty stars).

Yellow and white (heraldic language - "or" and "argent") are "metals" - ie, they represent gold and silver on a shield.

Black (heraldic language - "sable") is a "fur".

All other colours are "tinctures".

It may not seem important now (although as you might guess, as a dedicated pedant it is important to me anytime) but if we were to make a success of AFCR&D, we might want to register our badge/arms to prevent others from nicking them - and we might therefore need the permission of the College of Heralds for a grant of arms - and if we did that, they wouldn't allow most of the designs we've been looking at, for a number of reasons: so we might as well get it right from the beginning?
AFCR&D Member Number 38 - Proud member of a Community Football Club, currently in exile in West Wales!
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: BADGE VOTE ROUND 1.5 - OPTION 3 Design 17

Post by Trek »

B ****y hell, Alan, anyone would think you used to be a graphic artist! ;)
Red Dragon
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: BADGE VOTE ROUND 1.5 - OPTION 3 Design 17

Post by Red Dragon »

Er.... I was!
AFCR&D Member Number 38 - Proud member of a Community Football Club, currently in exile in West Wales!
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: BADGE VOTE ROUND 1.5 - OPTION 3 Design 17

Post by Trek »

Red Dragon wrote:Er.... I was!
For London Transport, I understand. ;)
Red Dragon
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: BADGE VOTE ROUND 1.5 - OPTION 3 Design 17

Post by Red Dragon »

Trek wrote:
Red Dragon wrote:Er.... I was!
For London Transport, I understand. ;)
Right, now this is getting weird... who are you?
AFCR&D Member Number 38 - Proud member of a Community Football Club, currently in exile in West Wales!
Cotty
Posts: 555
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:34 pm
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: BADGE VOTE ROUND 1.5 - OPTION 3 Design 17

Post by Cotty »

it's getting a bit like one of those 'spot the difference' puzzles in childrens' comics!
User avatar
Bobos
Posts: 1512
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:17 pm

Re: BADGE VOTE ROUND 1.5 - OPTION 3 Design 17

Post by Bobos »

Red Dragon wrote:
Trek wrote:
Red Dragon wrote:Er.... I was!
For London Transport, I understand. ;)
Right, now this is getting weird... who are you?


It;s either God or a stalker 8-)
Locked