Wrexham

wewantourdarbyback · Post by **wewantourdarbyback** » Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:14 pm

From what I've heard from the Crusaders fallout (being a northerner) the RFL have a bond on the Racecourse that helped Crusaders stay afloat. Whether that affects Wrexham I don't knoe.

coltrane · Post by **coltrane** » Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:25 pm

TheIncognitoKid wrote:
coltrane wrote:They should definitely turn a blind eye to any impropriety on Wrexham's part after all kicking one dodgy club into oblivion in a season should be enough for any football authority, eh! :(
You should change your name to Richard Head! :roll:

Clever post by you well done. :lol:

Three of Diamonds · Post by **Three of Diamonds** » Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:06 pm

Wrexham problem seems to be deepening, poor buggers

http://www.redpassion.co.uk/forums/wrex ... rse-4.html

Cancelled a friendly allegedly due the players not being paid

http://www.redpassion.co.uk/forums/wrex ... lease.html

TheIncognitoKid · Post by **TheIncognitoKid** » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:01 pm

coltrane wrote:
TheIncognitoKid wrote:
coltrane wrote:They should definitely turn a blind eye to any impropriety on Wrexham's part after all kicking one dodgy club into oblivion in a season should be enough for any football authority, eh! :(
You should change your name to Richard Head! :roll:
Clever post by you well done. :lol:

Very clever if you do it!

HiHoRushden&Diamonds · Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:50 pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/14329582.stm

Seems a bit familiar...

Formic · Post by **Formic** » Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:45 am

It's looking worse for them now - http://www.footballconference.co.uk/new ... ws_id=5115

I'd guess the cancellation of the two friendlies will remind the Conference Board of how Chester City started their aborted season, and the current Wrexham owners might not be able to give the guarantee that their club will finish the season. However, Wrexham clearly have a significant and passionate fanbase and that might make the Conference Board think twice about throwing them out.

Trek · Post by **Trek** » Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:01 am

Formic wrote: However, Wrexham clearly have a significant and passionate fanbase and that might make the Conference Board think twice about throwing them out.

That should make no absolutely no difference, if Wrexham's current directors cannot give the necessary financial guarantees, bearing in minding our fate at the hands of the Conference board in similar circumstances last month.

davealbon · Post by **davealbon** » Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:59 am

Trek wrote:
Formic wrote: However, Wrexham clearly have a significant and passionate fanbase and that might make the Conference Board think twice about throwing them out.
That should make no absolutely no difference, if Wrexham's current directors cannot give the necessary financial guarantees, bearing in minding our fate at the hands of the Conference board in similar circumstances last month.

It shouldn't do, you're right, but we all know what a joke the Conference board are.

Everyweeker · Post by **Everyweeker** » Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:04 pm

davealbon wrote:
Trek wrote:
Formic wrote: However, Wrexham clearly have a significant and passionate fanbase and that might make the Conference Board think twice about throwing them out.
That should make no absolutely no difference, if Wrexham's current directors cannot give the necessary financial guarantees, bearing in minding our fate at the hands of the Conference board in similar circumstances last month.
It shouldn't do, you're right, but we all know what a joke the Conference board are.

Is that on the record, Mr Secretary?

;)

davealbon · Post by **davealbon** » Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:31 pm

Everyweeker wrote:Is that on the record, Mr Secretary? ;)

It's alright, we're not in the Conference! :lol:

Wrexham

Re: Wrexham

Re: Wrexham

Re: Wrexham

Re: Wrexham

Re: Wrexham

Re: Wrexham

Re: Wrexham

Re: Wrexham

Re: Wrexham

Re: Wrexham