I noticed that......

[Trek]

....... Oadby Town only managed a 0-0 draw at home to lowly Bourne today. They're still top but we've narrowed the goal difference with our four goals today.

Early days I know.

[BartonRaz]

Early days or not, we know who the frontrunners are going to be. I celebrated their result like one of our goals. ;)

[Formic]

It looks like being a pretty tight league though, with Sileby signing 3 more of the ex-Long Buckby players, and Bugbrooke still having a 100% record, its a long way from being a two-horse race.

[Trek]

Whitworths won 2-0 at home to Raunds with Sileby winning 2-0 away at ON Chenecks so they're going to be in the mix.

[Pigman]

Who cares ;) Lets focus on what WE do and OUR results !! Fantastic today lads - now lets do the same to Yaxley

[Trek]

Table updated:-

http://www.nonleaguematters.co.uk/divisions/42/

[Red Dragon]

How can Oadby have won eight - five at home and three away - when they've only played six games?

[Diamond Warrior]

How can Oadby have won eight - five at home and three away - when they've only played six games?

The first column is for overall. They've won 3 at home and 2 away.

[Formic]

Table updated:-

http://www.nonleaguematters.co.uk/divisions/42/

I find the table on the main UCL site on FA Full-Time is updated pretty quickly these days - http://full-time.thefa.com/ProcessPubli ... ue=1625657 - and doesn't have the errors that this one has - e.g. missing the Thrapston v Rothwell game.

I note that Sileby host Oadby next weekend, so that will give us a better idea of how good Oadby are.

[Rushdenjim]

How can Oadby have won eight - five at home and three away - when they've only played six games?

The first column is for overall. They've won 3 at home and 2 away.

Yeah i thing the table on the OW needs headers because it took me a while to work out what each column meant