A REAL BAD 'UN

Sports, jokes, news and general waffle.
woody
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:59 pm

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by woody »

Diamondsforever wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/mers ... 554011.stm

These 2 should never have been released in the first place IMO, this whole situation could have been avoided had they actually served a sentence that fitted the crime.
Image
'If women are so bloody perfect at multitasking, how come they can't have a headache and sex at the same time?
Billy Connolly
wewantourdarbyback
Posts: 1716
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:59 pm
Location: The south these days

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by wewantourdarbyback »

woody wrote:MIRROR alleges......................

A report in the Sunday Mirror claims Venables was returned to jail "on suspicion of child porn offences".
Which is completely unethical by that shitrag of a paper. I would not be surprised to see them up in front of a judge for contempt at some point as that easily passes the test of creating 'a substantial risk of serious prejudice to the case'. And if they are hauled in front of said judge then it will only serve them right.

The right to be innocent until proven guilty is one of the most important rights we have in this country. Until he is charged with anything no one has the right to judge anyone guilty because of past crimes. If we do, we might as well allow lynch mobs.
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 354

You could have 140 years of no achievement, or twenty years of glorious victories, you decide.

One Dale Roberts.

Twitter
rudolph_hucker
Posts: 1750
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:22 pm

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by rudolph_hucker »

wewantourdarbyback wrote:
woody wrote:MIRROR alleges......................

A report in the Sunday Mirror claims Venables was returned to jail "on suspicion of child porn offences".
Which is completely unethical by that shitrag of a paper. I would not be surprised to see them up in front of a judge for contempt at some point as that easily passes the test of creating 'a substantial risk of serious prejudice to the case'. And if they are hauled in front of said judge then it will only serve them right.

The right to be innocent until proven guilty is one of the most important rights we have in this country. Until he is charged with anything no one has the right to judge anyone guilty because of past crimes. If we do, we might as well allow lynch mobs.

Top post
You're knocked out with who I am,
Look at you now, you're all in my hands.
woody
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:59 pm

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by woody »

rudolph_hucker wrote:
wewantourdarbyback wrote:
woody wrote:MIRROR alleges......................

A report in the Sunday Mirror claims Venables was returned to jail "on suspicion of child porn offences".
Which is completely unethical by that shitrag of a paper. I would not be surprised to see them up in front of a judge for contempt at some point as that easily passes the test of creating 'a substantial risk of serious prejudice to the case'. And if they are hauled in front of said judge then it will only serve them right.

The right to be innocent until proven guilty is one of the most important rights we have in this country. Until he is charged with anything no one has the right to judge anyone guilty because of past crimes. If we do, we might as well allow lynch mobs.

Top post
On THIS occasion - I must agree!

The Mirror has used the loophole that WE don't know his new identity so NO LIBEL LAWS + is now an adult. THIS HAS BEEN DONE TO SELL PAPERS ONLY. I too, hope the Government Legals use all their power against the paper. However................Its taken Gordon Brown off the front pages (SURPRISE SURPRISE)
'If women are so bloody perfect at multitasking, how come they can't have a headache and sex at the same time?
Billy Connolly
rudolph_hucker
Posts: 1750
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:22 pm

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by rudolph_hucker »

I didn't buy one.
You're knocked out with who I am,
Look at you now, you're all in my hands.
woody
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:59 pm

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by woody »

rudolph_hucker wrote:I didn't buy one.
Me neither..............Read the Internet versions
'If women are so bloody perfect at multitasking, how come they can't have a headache and sex at the same time?
Billy Connolly
StaceyH
Posts: 1615
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:06 am
Has Liked: 2 times
Been Liked: 24 times

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by StaceyH »

I can't remember the last time I actually paid money for a newspaper 8-)
R.I.P Dale....always and forever in our hearts
woody
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:59 pm

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by woody »

Diamondsforever wrote:I can't remember the last time I actually paid money for a newspaper 8-)
WELL SAID................. CHIP WRAPPINGS :lol: :lol: :lol:
'If women are so bloody perfect at multitasking, how come they can't have a headache and sex at the same time?
Billy Connolly
mattreddan
Posts: 955
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:59 am

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by mattreddan »

wewantourdarbyback wrote:guilty is one of the most important rights we have in this country. Until he is charged with anything no one has the right to judge anyone guilty because of past crimes. If we do, we might as well allow lynch mobs.
You're right that its a very important right, but this peice of scum imo has NO RIGHTS. He MURDERED a 2 year old child. Regardless of his age at the time, coupled with the fact he's BACK in prision, regardless of whatever he's done, thats enough for me to say he doesn't deserve to have any rights.
woody
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:59 pm

Re: A REAL BAD 'UN

Post by woody »

mattreddan wrote:
wewantourdarbyback wrote:guilty is one of the most important rights we have in this country. Until he is charged with anything no one has the right to judge anyone guilty because of past crimes. If we do, we might as well allow lynch mobs.
You're right that its a very important right, but this peice of scum imo has NO RIGHTS. He MURDERED a 2 year old child. Regardless of his age at the time, coupled with the fact he's BACK in prision, regardless of whatever he's done, thats enough for me to say he doesn't deserve to have any rights.
Whilst I agreed with D4E, RH & WWODB............... you make a very good case. - BUT if this wasn't a case concerning a two year old child, would you still think the same?

OUR freedom to be seen as innocent until PROVEN guilty is one of the most treasured freedoms we STILL have under E.U and International Law.

No doubt, if the stories ARE proven in court, this MURDERER (yes that is what he is), should never see freedom again, the key being thrown away for the good and safety of children in general.


However...........if his name (whatever it now may be) should be cleared and the Mirror be taken to task over it. (IMHO - The way that Jack Straw, Harriett Harmon and Gordon Brown are acting, tells me there must be overwhelming evidence to convict)
'If women are so bloody perfect at multitasking, how come they can't have a headache and sex at the same time?
Billy Connolly
Post Reply