Drink Throwing Incident

All things unofficial about AFC Rushden & Diamonds and general football talk.
Post Reply
SouthRushdenJFC
Posts: 2120
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:25 pm
Has Liked: 49 times
Been Liked: 36 times

Drink Throwing Incident

Post by SouthRushdenJFC »

Not us. It appears that Ash Deeney, who 'played' for us in pre-season had a drink thrown over him as he left the pitch at Latimer Park last night.

Let's see what the Facebook warriors make of that
Mat.H
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:48 am

Re: Drink Throwing Incident

Post by Mat.H »

Good job his brother wasn't there.
AFC R&D Membership No 283
Brownie
Posts: 2025
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:03 am
Been Liked: 34 times

Re: Drink Throwing Incident

Post by Brownie »

SouthRushdenJFC wrote:Not us. It appears that Ash Deeney, who 'played' for us in pre-season had a drink thrown over him as he left the pitch at Latimer Park last night.

Let's see what the Facebook warriors make of that
Think it was before the game as he walked behind the goal in front of the K*ttering fans, it`s laughable the comments being made on the Ploppies forum, some are justifying it because his brother is in their opinion a prat, and it could have got the Club in trouble, though they appear sure nothing will be made of it!, If liquid was thrown over any area containing prats or persons connected to said prats presume that explains why so many games were lost to a waterlogged pitch at LP this season. Also amusing to read the comments regarding ground capacity there, ground inspection it is implied was probably done prior to cutting all the trees down and opening up the 4th side, though in the eyes of some it matters not as to the present suitability of that area or if it should even be allowed to be used, as it`s better than some of the other places they have been this season :roll: and as for those who went to support them last night and had the nerve to complain of overcrowding & unable to see much, the caring answer was come more often so we have more money to spend on ground improvements :oops: either that or another Just giving page maybe. looks like a few there are back to the good old days of, we think we are a big Club, f**k everyone else we do what we want.
diamondphil
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:50 pm

Re: Drink Throwing Incident

Post by diamondphil »

I actually attended the game (I know......) and was disappointed with the lack of anywhere to stand and actually watch/see the game. The bar was a write off towards kick-off. Attendance was announced as 1446

the place is a shit hole and would benefit from a bit of terracing at each end and it would resolve any restricted view, as more than 2 people deep around the outsides you just can't see the whole pitch.

If i were actually interested in the game, rather than just meeting some ground hoppers from down London way, i would've been very disappointed, in fact i was more disappointed that the queue for the bar was so bad i couldn't have more than one pint........

don't even start me on the traffic issues afterwards :roll:
I feel sorry for people who don't drink................when they wake up in the morning, that's the best they're going to feel all day.
Rushdenjim
Posts: 1917
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:50 pm
Location: Rushden
Has Liked: 114 times
Been Liked: 17 times

Re: Drink Throwing Incident

Post by Rushdenjim »

diamondphil wrote:I actually attended the game (I know......) and was disappointed with the lack of anywhere to stand and actually watch/see the game. The bar was a write off towards kick-off. Attendance was announced as 1446

the place is a shit hole and would benefit from a bit of terracing at each end and it would resolve any restricted view, as more than 2 people deep around the outsides you just can't see the whole pitch.

If i were actually interested in the game, rather than just meeting some ground hoppers from down London way, i would've been very disappointed, in fact i was more disappointed that the queue for the bar was so bad i couldn't have more than one pint........

don't even start me on the traffic issues afterwards :roll:
To be fair to them, 1446 is a massive one off attendance that they would not have been able to cater for without great expense. Which is unjustifiable given it was a one off.
Post Reply