Re: Nene Park

AFCRD_Dan · Post by **AFCRD_Dan** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 6:17 pm

I notice the letter has reached the UCL Facebook page. The less said about some of the comments on there the better. :evil:

Bob's Bitch · Post by **Bob's Bitch** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 7:16 pm

It's been said before and I'll say it again. I don't know why anyone reads that UCL Facebook page. Just block it and save yourself the bother and annoyance!

rudolph_hucker · Post by **rudolph_hucker** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 7:24 pm

Bob's Bitch wrote:It's been said before and I'll say it again. I don't know why anyone reads that UCL Facebook page. Just block it and save yourself the bother and annoyance!

When I want the opinion of a cock I'll ask. I'll read whatever I choose to read. It doesn't bother me that they dislike you. Neither does it annoy me.

Trek · Post by **Trek** » Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:12 am

Screening Opinion sought from ENC for 'Proposed Leisure/Retail Development' at Nene Park.

http://pawebsrv.east-northamptonshire.g ... 7W1GO06400

http://otportalsrv.east-northamptonshir ... /01609/SCR

Mat.H · Post by **Mat.H** » Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:03 am

Who do they expect to play on the football facility. One of those goals 5 a side would be best.

Mat.H · Post by **Mat.H** » Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:36 am

It's OK false alarm, if you read the covering letter the proposal is for a simular site in Rushton :roll:

Trek · Post by **Trek** » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:36 am

Mat.H wrote:Who do they expect to play on the football facility.

I suppose they think they are being clever to get over the 'covenant issue' on the main stadium pitch by replacing it and retaining Pitch 3. Zero thought given to this proposal as no changing facilities available now in the Sports & Exhibition Centre.

Formic · Post by **Formic** » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:47 am

It looks like the familiar set of buzz words and phrases designed to make people think its an interlinked package of attractive facilities, only to then find that the money making parts are implemented and the costly features that would benefit the community are quietly forgotten.

The "improved car parking for the Town Centre" and "improved pedestrian access to the Town Centre" in particular look like standard offerings without an assessment of practicality.

nsman · Post by **nsman** » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:48 am

Actually I think at first glance this looks interesting. Surely the fack that a smaller football facility is being considered with consideration paid to the past history of R&D is potentially something that we could be involved in, albeit we might need to influence the final plan to suit us?

Trek · Post by **Trek** » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:55 am

Can't see them prepared to allocate more land to enable facilities to be provided for even a Step 6 club. Even park teams need basic changing facilities.