Page 5 of 5

Re: Coventry City...

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 1:41 pm
by Dazzler
Note: There is no truth to the rumour that Coventry have moved to Northampton in order to attract Starms.

Re: Coventry City...

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:19 pm
by sussexdiamond
Can we be surprised at anything the FL sanction after allowing Wimbledon FC to die in that move to MK??

Brighton were allowed to move to Gillingham for several seasons more than 60 miles away, before decamping to the awful Withdean.( That FA Cup tie there nearly gave me pneumonia)

Coventry fans may get a little bit of hope from looking at Brighton now, but it took a very long time!!!

Re: Coventry City...

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:24 pm
by Trek
sussexdiamond wrote:Can we be surprised at anything the FL sanction after allowing Wimbledon FC to die in that move to MK??
It was actually the FA that sanctioned Wimbledon's move to MK. However, I agree that the Football League shouldn't have permitted Coventry to move. Interesting that SISU waited until the fixtures were released before announcing this.

Re: Coventry City...

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:53 pm
by sandringhamdiamond

Re: Coventry City...

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 12:30 pm
by Trek
Not all plain sailing on the ground share front.

http://www.wsc.co.uk/wsc-daily/1164-jul ... ton-either