Time added on..?

All things unofficial about AFC Rushden & Diamonds and general football talk.
Dukes
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 4:00 pm

Time added on..?

Post by Dukes »

Couldn't believe only 2 mins added on after first half. There were 4 stoppages for injuries each lasting at least 2 minutes and the time added on for the goal. Do the officials make this up..?

Also couldn't believe Farrell's miss..! :o

And couldn't believe Eddy's celebration..! :lol:
Last edited by Dukes on Tue Feb 22, 2011 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
TheIncognitoKid
Posts: 3206
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:21 pm
Location: Higham Ferrers
Has Liked: 64 times
Been Liked: 36 times

Re: Time added on..?

Post by TheIncognitoKid »

Dukes wrote:Couldn't believe only 2 mins added on after first half. There were 4 stoppages for injuries each lasting at least 2 minutes and the time added on for the goal. Do the officials make this up..?

Also couldn't believe Farrell's miss..! :o
To be fair to him i thought he slipped a bit. Still maybe should have kept it down tho
diamond.jack99
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:50 pm

Re: Time added on..?

Post by diamond.jack99 »

TheIncognitoKid wrote:
Dukes wrote:Couldn't believe only 2 mins added on after first half. There were 4 stoppages for injuries each lasting at least 2 minutes and the time added on for the goal. Do the officials make this up..?

Also couldn't believe Farrell's miss..! :o
To be fair to him i thought he slipped a bit. Still maybe should have kept it down tho
azzas pass wasnt to helpful either
BartonRaz
Posts: 5824
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:56 pm
Location: Irthlingborough
Has Liked: 5 times
Been Liked: 178 times

Re: Time added on..?

Post by BartonRaz »

I know this is going to sound like a strange one considering he didn't make any glaring errors as such, but i thought the ref today was diabolical.

Firstly, as you rightly point out, there should have been at least 5 minutes added on in the first half. Secondly, he regularly appeared to change his mind when giving throw-ins. Thirdly, he booked a couple of our players (I can remember Porter being one) for routine slide tackles. And last by no means least, he signaled like he had given a free kick for Oshodi's goal which meant that the ground fell momentarily silent. Listening to the radio coming away from the ground, it was clear that they were confused also.
Last edited by BartonRaz on Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
They say we've lost our money we're not famous anymore.....

AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
therushden
Posts: 1226
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:10 pm
Has Liked: 157 times
Been Liked: 7 times

Re: Time added on..?

Post by therushden »

should have gone to the back stick, paris was honing in on goal.
Dale Roberts. England's number 1.
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 50
Dukes
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Time added on..?

Post by Dukes »

BartonRaz wrote:I know this is going to sound like a strange one considering he didn't make an glaring errors at such, but i thought the ref today was diabolical.

Firstly, as you rightly point out, there should have been at least 5 minutes added on in the first half. Secondly, he regularly appeared to change his mind when giving throw-ins. Thirdly, he booked a couple of our players (I can remember Porter being one) for routine slide tackles. And last by no means least, he signaled like he had given a free kick for Oshodi's goal which meant that the ground fell momentarily silent. Listening to the radio coming away from the ground, it was clear that they were confused also.
Yes 3 bookings in a non-physical game, although PCH's card looked justified..?
BartonRaz
Posts: 5824
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:56 pm
Location: Irthlingborough
Has Liked: 5 times
Been Liked: 178 times

Re: Time added on..?

Post by BartonRaz »

Dukes wrote:
BartonRaz wrote:I know this is going to sound like a strange one considering he didn't make an glaring errors at such, but i thought the ref today was diabolical.

Firstly, as you rightly point out, there should have been at least 5 minutes added on in the first half. Secondly, he regularly appeared to change his mind when giving throw-ins. Thirdly, he booked a couple of our players (I can remember Porter being one) for routine slide tackles. And last by no means least, he signaled like he had given a free kick for Oshodi's goal which meant that the ground fell momentarily silent. Listening to the radio coming away from the ground, it was clear that they were confused also.
Yes 3 bookings in a non-physical game, although PCH's card looked justified..?
Yes just about. It was Osano's awful pass that left him pretty much no choice.
They say we've lost our money we're not famous anymore.....

AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
supersub
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:40 pm

Re: Time added on..?

Post by supersub »

We should of had time added on for the time wasted tying up boot laces! What was that all about?! :roll:
Dukes
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Time added on..?

Post by Dukes »

Can't wait for Big Eddy's next goal..!

Bet he got a lot of good humoured stick after the game.. :D
SCARECROW
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:36 pm

Re: Time added on..?

Post by SCARECROW »

Dukes wrote:Also couldn't believe Farrell's miss..!
TBH i would imagine everyone in the ground and Faz thought that Azza would go for goal as he normally does, i don't know who was more supriseed when Az cut the ball back, me or Faz!

For me the worst miss was the free header Faz had on goal before Eddie scored!
Post Reply