Conference AGM tomorrow

All things unofficial about AFC Rushden & Diamonds and general football talk.
Reality
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 6:36 am

Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by Reality »

I hope the Conference Board are truly independent....

I have just spoken to a very down and disappointed KC. He has spent today (and the past few weeks) trying to find some potential investors to dig us out of the hole those mupptes Bee-zant have got us into.

I understand that there is still a very real possibility that new investors (not the Hoddle mob) will buy the Club and rescue us - but it looks like they need another couple of days to get all the funds together.

KC and his business partner today approached the Conf Board and provided an undertaking that they will put up several hundred thousand pounds pending a takeover. According to KC the Conf Board pretty much dismised this offer and were anything but sympathetic.

I wonder why? It cannot have anything to do with the fact that the Vice Chair of the Conf Board happens to be the Chairman of Southport? And if we are expelled or wound-up, guess which team will be reprieved - er, Southport. And guess where the Conf Board have been today - playing golf at the Celtic Manor. And we all know what sort of tapping up could happen on a golf course, don't we?

I do hope the Conf Board see sense and at least allow us a stay of execution for a few more days - if there are no investors then we will fold anyway.

Failing that I hope other Clubs in a dire financial situations are treated in the same manor - Wrexham? Cambridge?

One thing I am sure of is that KC and his business partner have worked tirelessly over the last few weeks to try and find a sustainable future for the Club. No blame can be laid at their door should we go pop - and no, I have no connection or allegiance to KC.

Keep you fingers crossed for tomorrow and let's hope the Conf Board see sense.
The Godfather
Posts: 1978
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:04 pm
Location: Rushden
Been Liked: 2 times

Re: Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by The Godfather »

"In Sicily, women are more dangerous than shotguns."
RiK2006
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:30 pm

Re: Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by RiK2006 »

SURELY theres a massive conflict of interest there!
There's only one Dale Roberts, one Dales Roberts, there's only one Dale ROBERTS! R.I.P
User avatar
Pigman
Posts: 4346
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Bedford
Has Liked: 14 times
Been Liked: 56 times

Re: Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by Pigman »

But this is the Conference, they make the rules up as they go along and seem to be answerable to absolutely no-one !!
Raising awareness of Motor Neurone Disease
RIP Dale Roberts - gone, but never forgotten!!
Formic
Posts: 4156
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:48 pm
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 19 times

Re: Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by Formic »

PigmanRDFC wrote:But this is the Conference, they make the rules up as they go along and seem to be answerable to absolutely no-one !!
To be fair though, the brinkmanship they have been facing in this and several other situations makes it difficult to do other than apply the rules they have made very clear in print this time.
BartonRaz
Posts: 5817
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:56 pm
Location: Irthlingborough
Has Liked: 5 times
Been Liked: 178 times

Re: Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by BartonRaz »

KC said at the fans forum that he had been seeking legal advice about the conflict of interest.

Thanks for the update Reality. I wonder if these investors would be prepared to buy the club if it were demoted, at least that way we still have a club.
They say we've lost our money we're not famous anymore.....

AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
HiHoRushden&Diamonds
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:00 pm

Re: Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by HiHoRushden&Diamonds »

Reality wrote: the Vice Chair of the Conf Board happens to be the Chairman of Southport? And if we are expelled or wound-up, guess which team will be reprieved - er, Southport. And guess where the Conf Board have been today - playing golf at the Celtic Manor. And we all know what sort of tapping up could happen on a golf course, don't we?
This seems plain wrong, surely there is little/no independence and neutrality from the people who will be deciding our future! :shock: :?
User avatar
Pigman
Posts: 4346
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Bedford
Has Liked: 14 times
Been Liked: 56 times

Re: Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by Pigman »

Formic wrote:
PigmanRDFC wrote:But this is the Conference, they make the rules up as they go along and seem to be answerable to absolutely no-one !!
To be fair though, the brinkmanship they have been facing in this and several other situations makes it difficult to do other than apply the rules they have made very clear in print this time.
They haven't got a great track record for acting in a sensible way though have they. I guess I'm just bitter that we've got to this situation. The trouble is, none of us know the full story so don't know for sure who deserves the blame for getting us into this mess - although I guess appointing blame is a pointless exercise in truth, it won't help us will !! Everything crossed here that something can be done overnight, but I'm really clutching at straws here.
Raising awareness of Motor Neurone Disease
RIP Dale Roberts - gone, but never forgotten!!
DustCobb
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:55 pm

Re: Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by DustCobb »

That conflict of interest is horrendous, sums up football thesedays though.
Biggles
Posts: 835
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:31 pm
Been Liked: 30 times

Re: Conference AGM tomorrow

Post by Biggles »

To clarify the whole 68 clubs of the Conference have the vote to decide our future so to pin a charge of conflict of interest based on 1 man out of 68 would be very hard.

Of course there is no rules against gaining support to Southports cause on the golf course yesterday.

It will depend on who is in our corner this weekend and what guarantee they could give to swing any vote in our favour.
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No. 32
Post Reply