Mal's pics added to the Match Report - http://www.afcdiamonds.com/bugbrooke-st ... diamonds-3
Stats updated - http://www.afcdiamonds.com/summary-stats-2012-13
[ Sat 9th Mar ] v Bugbrooke St Michaels KO 3pm UCL1 AWAY
Re: [ Sat 9th Mar ] v Bugbrooke St Michaels KO 3pm UCL1 AWAY
They should show that blantant hand ball picture to the "Road kill" fans that stood near to me :lol: :lol:
Re: [ Sat 9th Mar ] v Bugbrooke St Michaels KO 3pm UCL1 AWAY
I didn't think he saved it, and the view on the highlights looks like he didn't but clearly he did and what a great touch it proved to be.davealbon wrote:Love the shots of Quincy's save from the free kick!
AFC R&D Member No. 67
Re: [ Sat 9th Mar ] v Bugbrooke St Michaels KO 3pm UCL1 AWAY
The attendance is given as 400 :roll: on mitoo. These are usually the final, official attendances, but 350 now 400, seems like a very rough estimate.
AFC Rushden & Diamonds Member - 101
Re: [ Sat 9th Mar ] v Bugbrooke St Michaels KO 3pm UCL1 AWAY
Are you unhappy with the figure published on Saturday? Would you prefer the attendance figure omitted until the home club updates mitoo?Sid wrote:The attendance is given as 400 :roll: on mitoo. These are usually the final, official attendances, but 350 now 400, seems like a very rough estimate.
Re: [ Sat 9th Mar ] v Bugbrooke St Michaels KO 3pm UCL1 AWAY
No not at all! I didn't realise that the 350 was an estimate and assumed the original figure had come from Bugbrooke and they had now deceided to round up to the next hundred.Formic wrote:Are you unhappy with the figure published on Saturday? Would you prefer the attendance figure omitted until the home club updates mitoo?Sid wrote:The attendance is given as 400 :roll: on mitoo. These are usually the final, official attendances, but 350 now 400, seems like a very rough estimate.
AFC Rushden & Diamonds Member - 101
Re: [ Sat 9th Mar ] v Bugbrooke St Michaels KO 3pm UCL1 AWAY
Our estimated 350 figure was actually corroborated by someone from BSM after the game - but its still not official at that point.Sid wrote:No not at all! I didn't realise that the 350 was an estimate and assumed the original figure had come from Bugbrooke and they had now deceided to round up to the next hundred.Formic wrote:Are you unhappy with the figure published on Saturday? Would you prefer the attendance figure omitted until the home club updates mitoo?Sid wrote:The attendance is given as 400 :roll: on mitoo. These are usually the final, official attendances, but 350 now 400, seems like a very rough estimate.