Joe Day transfer fee is.....

All things unofficial about AFC Rushden & Diamonds and general football talk.
coolcuts
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:56 am

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by coolcuts »

Remember when he first started to play and everyone wanted Dale back in goal , as his goal kicks kept going into the stands and was always making bad decisions. His come far though in very little time. Good leaner
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by Trek »

coolcuts wrote:Remember when he first started to play and everyone wanted Dale back in goal, as his goal kicks kept going into the stands and was always making bad decisions.
But Dale at the time was in no position to return because of the long term injury he sustained playing for England 'C'.
wewantourdarbyback
Posts: 1716
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:59 pm
Location: The south these days

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by wewantourdarbyback »

Trek wrote:Reading that Peterborough Evening Telegraph reader's comments I didn't realize that the next great white hope for the goalie spot for England, Joe Lewis, is not that well regarded and is on the transfer list so a great opportunity for Joe Day has presented itself.
However, I hope the Posh goal-keeping coach can sort out Joe's desire to punch the ball at every opportunity. He's a big lad, and in my opinion, should be catching crosses more often.
He put in a transfer request, that's why he's listed, nowt to do with him being not that well regarded.
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 354

You could have 140 years of no achievement, or twenty years of glorious victories, you decide.

One Dale Roberts.

Twitter
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by Trek »

wewantourdarbyback wrote: He put in a transfer request, that's why he's listed, nowt to do with him being not that well regarded.
General Tone of the reader's comments:-

'Lewis has not cut the mustard during his stay at London Rd, he does not impose himself on the game enough to be regarded as fully competent'.

Maybe he's part of the reason why Peterborough leak goals right, left and centre. ;)
JamesRDFC
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:10 pm

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by JamesRDFC »

Trek wrote:
wewantourdarbyback wrote: He put in a transfer request, that's why he's listed, nowt to do with him being not that well regarded.
General Tone of the reader's comments:-

'Lewis has not cut the mustard during his stay at London Rd, he does not impose himself on the game enough to be regarded as fully competent'.

Maybe he's part of the reason why Peterborough leak goals right, left and centre. ;)
Judging from his performances against MK Dons and Bournemouth on TV in the last couple of weeks, he is.
One Dale Roberts. Never forgotten. R.I.P.

AFC Rushden & Diamonds member no. 90
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by Trek »

JamesRDFC wrote:
Judging from his performances against MK Dons and Bournemouth on TV in the last couple of weeks, he is.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/12963343.stm

The Posh have conceeded 67 goals in 40 league games. :shock: It's a good job their striker's know where the net is.
oliv272
Posts: 428
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:22 pm
Location: Higham Ferrers
Has Liked: 10 times
Been Liked: 11 times

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by oliv272 »

I think the Posh defenders are more to blame for all the goals conceded that their GK i have seen some highlights of their games and before they got back their current manager their defenders were awful.
FuriousHoon / Ollie
RiK2006
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:30 pm

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by RiK2006 »

Im hearing rumours that the fee was considerable as it includes a buyout of Tomlins sell on fee. This is only from a Posh fan with his ear to the ground.
There's only one Dale Roberts, one Dales Roberts, there's only one Dale ROBERTS! R.I.P
Bob's Bitch
Posts: 3693
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:41 pm
Location: Vancouver
Has Liked: 34 times
Been Liked: 6 times

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by Bob's Bitch »

RiK2006 wrote:I'm hearing rumours that the fee was considerable as it includes a buyout of Tomlin's sell-on fee. This is only from a Posh fan with his ear to the ground.
Nooooo! :(
R.I.P Dale. We will never forget you.

AFC R&D - Member No. 46
Oundle Diamond #2
Posts: 1612
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: London

Re: Joe Day transfer fee is.....

Post by Oundle Diamond #2 »

RiK2006 wrote:Im hearing rumours that the fee was considerable as it includes a buyout of Tomlins sell on fee. This is only from a Posh fan with his ear to the ground.
Well we've lost out if it's anything less than 500k then! Probably a short-term fix with no consideration to the future.
Post Reply